An Oregon State University study found that used up hemp biomass, which is the main by-product of the cannabinoid (CBD) extraction process of hemp, can be included in lamb diets without any major detrimental effects to the health of the animals or their meat quality.
The findings are significant because the hemp by-products, known as spent hemp biomass, currently have little to no economic value for the hemp industry. The findings were recently published in the Journal of Animal Science.
Spent hemp biomass also has not been legalized as feed for livestock by the Food and Drug Administration due to the potential presence of THC and its potential impacts on animal health, so this finding is one step forward to getting that approval.
“To our knowledge, our study is the first to evaluate the effects of feeding spent hemp biomass to livestock,” said Serkan Ates, an associate professor in Oregon State’s College of Agricultural Sciences.
“The findings are important for both hemp farmers and livestock producers because they provide evidence that this by-product of hemp can be used in livestock diets. If the Food and Drug Administration approves its use as an animal feedstuff, hemp farmers could have a market for what is essentially a waste product and livestock producers may be able to save money by supplementing their feed with the spent hemp biomass.”
The study was backed by the Oregon Beef Council, with additional support from the Global Hemp Innovation Center at Oregon State University and the USDA Agricultural Research Service.
For the study, the Oregon State researchers fed male lambs two different amounts of spent hemp biomass (10% and 20% of total feed) and then withheld the hemp biomass for four weeks, a so-called withdrawal period. They then assessed weight gain, carcass characteristics, meat quality and health parameters of the lambs.
They found that the nutritional quality of spent hemp biomass is at par with alfalfa, which is commonly fed to lambs, and presents lower palatability and better digestibility.
Feed intake was negatively affected by feeding 20% spent hemp biomass in the short term but not in the long term, while feeding 10% spent hemp biomass increased feed intake long-term. Despite this, no effects on the weight of the lambs were observed.
Except for an increase in shrink and cook loss that also may affect the tenderness, other parameters related to carcass and meat quality were not affected by feeding spent hemp biomass.
Spent hemp biomass affected metabolism in a way that does not appear detrimental and improved the antioxidant capacity of the animals.
The liver of the animals was not affected but a decrease in liver clearance was observed, the ability of the liver to extract or metabolize a drug. The authors indicated that this last finding requires further investigation, since it could affect the clearance of other drugs that may be given to lambs.
“Although more research is still needed, spent hemp biomass can be considered a safe feed for ruminants and a good alternative to alfalfa for livestock, especially if it presents an economic benefit,” Ates said.
Co-authors of the paper were Nathan Parker, Massimo Bionaz, Hunter Ford andAgung Irawan, all of Oregon State’s Department of Animal and Rangeland Sciences; and Erminio Trevisi of Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore in Italy.
